Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
General
Dealing with Lawson / Infor
Huron
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Chris Radcliffe
Past 24 Hours:
1
Prev. 24 Hours:
0
Overall:
5187
People Online:
Visitors:
69
Members:
0
Total:
69
Online Now:
New Topics
Lawson Landmark
LPL INSTR Functions
4/5/2024 8:32 PM
I'm writing a simple report using the Create R
Infor SCM
Translating 856 to get the ~ REF^CN^ field
4/3/2024 8:24 PM
We are trying to get the tracking number which is
IPA/ProcessFlow
Sample XML file create Flow
4/3/2024 3:43 PM
Hello everyone, I am new to creating XML files
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
bn105 error message
3/26/2024 6:40 PM
I need to change some of the set ups in our Life I
IPA/ProcessFlow
IPA executing Job
3/13/2024 7:08 PM
New to the IPA world and was wondering, can an IPA
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Life Age Reduction on benefits plans
3/12/2024 7:15 PM
For our optional life we have an age based coverag
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
BN53.1 Add-In
3/7/2024 3:31 PM
We are migrating to Solstice. They require a
Lawson Business Intelligence/Reporting/Crystal
Domain Name Change
3/5/2024 7:45 PM
Our domain name needs to change and was hoping I c
S3 Customization/Development
Cobol calling Shell Script
2/29/2024 1:27 PM
Has anyone created or modified a Lawson Cobol prog
Infor ION
ION vs IPA
2/29/2024 1:24 AM
We had a person new to Lawson and Infor go to Info
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3288
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1348
Roger French
1311
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Unanswered
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Dealing with Lawson / Infor
Huron
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author
Messages
example_user
New Member
Posts: 2
8/7/2009 2:31 PM
Does anyone have any thoughts on how the latest news on Huron will impact their Lawson practice?
http://www.cnbc.com/id/32...81545?__source=yahoo
|headline|quote|text|&par=yahoo
Chris Martin
Veteran Member
Posts: 277
8/7/2009 3:12 PM
Uh, is someone who wants to remain anonymous competing against Huron for a client or ??? Odd post from an odd user...
example_user
New Member
Posts: 2
8/7/2009 3:13 PM
No, not at all. It just seems like there has been a pretty big shakeup at Huron, one of Lawson's partners, and I was curious.
mark.cook
Veteran Member
Posts: 444
8/17/2009 4:08 PM
We have used Huron on several occasions and received an email from them a few weeks ago to not expect the consulting side of the house to be impacted by restating of income. Huron has been the grants specialist and we use them for that piece. I wouldn't let this impact whether or not to hire them. They are the best I've found in terms of GM consulting.
John Henley
Senior Member
Posts: 3348
8/17/2009 4:27 PM
Their Lawson practice is very specialized and appears to be a tiny portion of the overall picture. On the other hand, same happened with Andersen and Bearingpoint. So, while I agree it's nothing to panic over, I would still be diligent.
mark.cook
Veteran Member
Posts: 444
8/19/2009 5:23 PM
I spoke with someone from Huron today. They indicated that the Lawson practice is not touched by the changes around this. The same consultants that we have used and will continue to use will not be effected. They also indicated there was no adverse effects to cash flows from the restatement of net income around the issue above. They were open with me and stated they have had several inquiries into the long term stability of Huron from clients, and from their perspective, all is the same in terms of long term stability with the firm. I hope this helped. It also helped me clarify the position of using Huron with the folks here at my site to get the facts from a trusted source inside Huron.
You are not authorized to post a reply.