IC500 - Please HELP if you can!

Author
Messages
TBonney
Veteran Member
Posts: 277
Veteran Member

    I have reviewed the file layout document for IC500, along with any KB articles I cold find and been going back and forth on an incident on Infor Xtreme. However, I can not get the IC500 job to process an inbound file properly without errorring out.

     

    I believe it is strictly the result of the headers being improperly named because the file layout document indicates the field names to contain spaces, hyphens, mixed case fields, upper case fields, etc., which I have never seen before and do not believe to be correctly documented.

    I've also never experienced an interface job like this one where you need to include both a header line and a detail line for each record (at least I think that is what is required).

    Has anyone else experienced this confusion with this job and, if so, are you willing to share your experience and provide some guidance on how to properly format the file and process the job/file successfully? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance!

    Greg Moeller
    Veteran Member
    Posts: 1498
    Veteran Member
      Perhaps a known good/working input file will help you...

      Find one attached.

      Attachments
      Greg Moeller
      Veteran Member
      Posts: 1498
      Veteran Member
        I don't think you need to include the headers.....
        Greg Moeller
        Veteran Member
        Posts: 1498
        Veteran Member
          The header is actually defined in the item number field (pos 24-29) where if item = 000000 * header record
          Unless you are using the CSV input file... I don't have experience with that.
          Greg Moeller
          Veteran Member
          Posts: 1498
          Veteran Member
            line number not item (sorry)
            TBonney
            Veteran Member
            Posts: 277
            Veteran Member

              Thanks so much for the information Greg. Apparently, I should have just started with the flat file approach instead of csv to begin with. Matching your fields to the file layout makes perfect sense. However, I do have one additional question if you don't mind...

              I see that you have LOC01 as the 'Location' for the first 9 records/rows and in the line 1 header record for that grouping, there is a single 'From or To Location' of 7012E identified. Then you have LOC02 as the 'Location' for the remaining 23 records/rows and, in the line 10 header record for that grouping, there is again only a single 'From or To Location' of 7031E identified. Which of these two locations would actually have the inventory decremented from it for the quantities being detailed within the line detail, LOC01/LOC02 or 7012E/7031E?

              I am asking this because the data I am being given from our materials management team appears to indicate that there can be multiple 'From or To Locations' within a single 'Location'? Therefore, I am trying to decipher how this would look in the designated file format.

              TBonney
              Veteran Member
              Posts: 277
              Veteran Member

                Greg, also, do you need to manually build the workdef file? I created a job to run using the flat file option, but the workdef shows all filler for everything after the line # & Seq #? Total file size is 1000 like the sample you provided me with, but all of the fields are not defined in the workdef. (Screen shot attached)

                 

                Attachments
                Greg Moeller
                Veteran Member
                Posts: 1498
                Veteran Member
                  LOC01 is our Inventory Location. I'm not an end-user of this, but I believe the 7012E/7031E are the From or To locations...
                  So to answer your main question, I believe that LOC01/LOC02 would be the ones decremented as that corresponds to our storeroom.
                  Greg Moeller
                  Veteran Member
                  Posts: 1498
                  Veteran Member
                    From what I remember..... the fields that are on the sample input file that I shared, NEED to be populated with either a space, a zero, or whatever they are populated with... we try not to populate anything that doesn't need it here, so I'm thinking you'd need to populate them too.
                    Greg Moeller
                    Veteran Member
                    Posts: 1498
                    Veteran Member
                      CSV files tend to be tricky.. esp with Lawson. Anytime you open them up in Excel MS in their infinite wisdom strips the leading zeros (which Lawson sometimes needs), and reformats things just a bit.. And heaven forbid if you ever save it without a backup copy.
                      I've struggled with using CSV files with Lawson, so go right back to the flat files.
                      Greg Moeller
                      Veteran Member
                      Posts: 1498
                      Veteran Member
                        No, we did not have to manually build the workdef file. Just took defaults.
                        Ragu Raghavan
                        Veteran Member
                        Posts: 468
                        Veteran Member
                          If I understand TBonney's question, what constitutes filler 256, filler 105, filler 604 shown in workdef?
                          You need to look at the file IC500WS, I think, depending on the rec-type, the record layout is defined in FIX-FFMST-REC, FAX-ICACTIVITY-REC, FCT-ICTRANS-REC, or FCD-ICTRANSDTL-REC
                          ---