Prev
Next
Forums Financial Management Lawson S3 Financials

AR575 vs AR580

 3 Replies
 2 Subscribed to this topic
 43 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Author
Messages
mikefortuna
Basic Member
Posts: 14
Basic Member
2/14/2020 5:39 PM
    We have been using AR575 for a while, but the AR580 file format is much simpler. It seems that AR575 contains a lot of parameters in the input file, while AR580 uses a lot of these as job parameters. What are the differences, if any, in using AR580 for cash application vs AR575?
    Tags: financials, lawson, ar575, ar580, AR, cash, cash application, payment
    Todd Mitchell
    Veteran Member
    Posts: 87
    Veteran Member
    2/14/2020 6:33 PM
      We have used both, the main difference is the input tables used to process the payments.
      Tags: financials, lawson, ar575, ar580, AR, cash, cash application, payment
      mikefortuna
      Basic Member
      Posts: 14
      Basic Member
      2/14/2020 7:46 PM
        I guess my question really centers around the results of the jobs. For example, cash code information is attached to the payment within the ARIPMT for AR575, but it is a parameter in AR580. When creating the payment batch, does AR580 know which payments to pull in from the ARIPAYMENT for the cash code entered in the job parameters?
        Tags: financials, lawson, ar575, ar580, AR, cash, cash application, payment
        Todd Mitchell
        Veteran Member
        Posts: 87
        Veteran Member
        2/21/2020 4:09 PM
          That is a very good question. The way we have used AR580 and AR575, it picks up anything in the interface table for the company code specified in the run time parameters. What I have seen is that the Process Level and/or cash code parameters are "overrides" to company defaults (AR01/AR00).
          Tags: financials, lawson, ar575, ar580, AR, cash, cash application, payment