Req Approval IPA Change Distribution?

 4 Replies
 1 Subscribed to this topic
 39 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Author
Messages
Kat V
Veteran Member
Posts: 1020
Veteran Member
New Poster
New Poster
Congrats on posting!
Engaged Reader
Engaged Reader
You are an engaged reader!
Avid Reader
Avid Reader
Avid Reader art thou!

Is anyone able to change the requisition accounting information during approvals?  I'd always said no as the req needs to be unreleased but I'm not sure if IPA couldn't do it?

 

Example - user keys in requisition and releases it but the approver wants it to go to a different activity code or use a different GL code.

Scooter
Veteran Member
Posts: 83
Veteran Member
New Poster
New Poster
Congrats on posting!
Requisition must be in "unreleased" status to make changes to it.
Kat V
Veteran Member
Posts: 1020
Veteran Member
New Poster
New Poster
Congrats on posting!
Engaged Reader
Engaged Reader
You are an engaged reader!
Avid Reader
Avid Reader
Avid Reader art thou!
Yes - but I'm wondering if IPA is sophisticated enough to not close the workunit - unreleased the req, make the approver changes, re-release the req and keep going up the chain?

Don't lose any of the previous approvals but it you are requesting small equipment and it gets to the Admin/CFO level that decide that it's part of an ongoing capital project - right now that unreleased is going all the way back to one and starting over.
David Williams
Veteran Member
Posts: 1127
Veteran Member
New Poster
New Poster
Congrats on posting!
I’ve had to something like this and unreleased the requisition within IPA, allowed the Approver to update the distributions and re-released the requisition. I had to add a step at the beginning of the flow to check if an active Workunit already existed for the requisition and if it did, to End the new Workunit.
David Williams
Kat V
Veteran Member
Posts: 1020
Veteran Member
New Poster
New Poster
Congrats on posting!
Engaged Reader
Engaged Reader
You are an engaged reader!
Avid Reader
Avid Reader
Avid Reader art thou!
OH! So it doesn't matter that the release triggers a second workunit - just as long as I didn't tell the first one to close. That's fantastic.