Who's On?

	Membership:
	Latest: John Bonin
	Past 24 Hours: 0
	Prev. 24 Hours: 0
	Overall: 5270

	People Online:
	Visitors: 52
	Members: 0
	Total: 52

Name	Points
Greg Moeller	4184
David Williams	3349
JonA	3291
Kat V	2984
Woozy	1973
Jimmy Chiu	1883
Kwane McNeal	1437
Ragu Raghavan	1375
Roger French	1315
mark.cook	1244

How can I test EDI?

3 Replies

0 Subscribed to this topic

1 Subscribed to this forum

Sort:

Author

Messages

John Costa

Veteran Member Send Private Message

Posts: 154

4/17/2012 12:46 PM

To all,

Forgive me, but I am not an EDI person nor have I been trained on the Lawson EDI product.

I recently upgraded my DEV environment, removing MKS Toolkit and installing Lawson Unix Utilities. Here are some further system details:

Windows Server 2008 - Enterprise - 64-bit
Lawson Environment 9.0.1.9
Lawson S3 Applications 9.0.1.7
Lawson EDI 9.0.1.5

At this point, I am trying to test EDI. I've verified that the Comm Server and Mail Agent are starting and I can execute ED330 with no issues. Where do I go from here? How can I test an EDI file of some kind to verify EDI is actually running and ready to process incoming files?

Thanks in advance for any help / suggestions.

JimY

Veteran Member Send Private Message

Posts: 510

4/17/2012 2:09 PM

Hi John,
If your EDI setups are the same on DEV as they are on production then you could copy the files from prod to DEV and run ED502 for 810 and 832 transactions. You would then run MA540 for the 810's to create the invoices and PO560 and PO150 for the 832's to load them. The files should be archived in $LAWDIR/logan/edi_arch_inb. For PO's you can create a PO using a vendor that is set up for EDI and then run PO120 and ED501. ED502 and ED501 would be in the LOGAN production line. Hope this helps.

JonA

Veteran Member Send Private Message

Posts: 1163

4/18/2012 6:25 PM

Actually ED501, ED502 and ED330 should all be run in the DEV productline if that's where your setups are.

JimY

Veteran Member Send Private Message

Posts: 510

4/19/2012 9:55 AM

I meant to say product line instead of production line. Sorry for the typo.