4GL Report missing Company Name

 5 Replies
 0 Subscribed to this topic
 17 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Author
Messages
Demi
Veteran Member Send Private Message
Posts: 67
Veteran Member
I have a custom 4GL program that has been migrated over into a new version 10 environment.  When performing a parallel comparison, the new 10 version is not listing the Company Name in the job submission parameters section.  I've tried running a new rptgen; but that hasn't helped. Any suggestions would be appreciated......
Ragu Raghavan
Veteran Member Send Private Message
Posts: 477
Veteran Member
Rules in the .sr file control how some of the screen fields work. Maybe you had a custom rule that did not get moved ?
Demi
Veteran Member Send Private Message
Posts: 67
Veteran Member
Thanks for your pointer.  I verified the .sr files and they look compatable. My issue is quite strange - it is only affecting a few of our custom 4GLs, not all of them.  I tried a recompile. Tried a rptgen and even a scrgen. I even went so far as to migrate the version back into the system.  So far nothing has helped.  I guess I should have stated that last point earlier in my description - it is a migrated custom from a different product line - not newly built within the product line. It's so weird, the company name does show up in the report heading of the same program; just not in the job submission parameters page (first page in our reports).  I had to open a call with GSC.
Greg Moeller
Veteran Member Send Private Message
Posts: 1498
Veteran Member
Have you made sure that all of the int files are gone, so they get regenerated? And then a lstinvk -q rm $LAWDIR/prodline/int/* rm $LAWDIR/prodline/*src/int/* lstinvk -q prodline cutstom-pgm-name then qcompile prodline custom-pgm-name
Jeff Wardzala
Basic Member Send Private Message
Posts: 9
Basic Member
Are you saying the job submission parameters are not in the generated .prt file or are they also missing from the submit form itself (.scr file). Have you done an scrgen to create an SD file to see if it appears there?
Demi
Veteran Member Send Private Message
Posts: 67
Veteran Member
Thanks Greg for your suggestions. I looked through all the intermediate libraries and everything looked fine. I then started back tracking in the system - I hate it when it only happens in one product line and the others are fine. I checked the Key Number definitions, and System Key Numbers; they looked fine too. It just felt off because some of the systemcode programs worked, while others didn't (customs and even a delivered PA340). Then I decided to recompile the form and object rules, just in case something quirky happened. Maybe something went astray between the application upgrades and the loading of the custom programs. It's now working! Thanks for the responses.