COBOL Slowness

 6 Replies
 3 Subscribed to this topic
 32 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Author
Messages
Corey
New Member
Posts: 2
New Member

    We are an Infor/Lawson customer working on an upgrade to their version 10 application suite. We are seeing significant delays in our batch job processing. When only one job is running with no users in our new environment we see process time 4 - 5 times longer than when they are run in version 9. We are running in a VM environment with the application and DB servers on separate servers running under Windows 2012 and SQL Server 2012 R2. After verifying and increasing resources on the servers we noted three things when the jobs are running.

    1. There is a FINDBEGRNG being used against the indexes, The increased times are associated with this call. The programs have been recompiled, with no change in the timing.

    2. While monitoring and capturing processing on the PID associated with the job there were messages indicating that that _ MFREDIR that the name not found or no such file. It attempted to locate the file multiple times with different file extensions - dll, gnt, int, 390, and lbr. The operation for Query Directory on path e:\MicroFocus\bin64\_MFREDIR(with each extension dll, gnt, int, and lbr) having a result of NO SUCH FILE with Detail: Filter:_MFREDIR(with each extension dll, gnt, int, and lbr). Same result and detail for QueryDirectory on E:\lsfprod\law\print\(User_ID). For QueryOpen Operation it appears to be looking for _MFREDIR in all of the directory structure - E:\MicroFocus\bin64, E:\MicroFocus\binn64, E:\MicroFocus\bin, C:\Windows\System32\, C:\Windows\System\, C:\Windows, E:\LUU, E:\cygwin64, E:\lsfprod\gen\bin, and under E:\Java, E:\PERL. All doing the QueryOpen looking for _MFREDIR.dll.

    3. After the job starts running and starts to perform COBOL it appears to stop and resource utilization drops to virtually no activity, which might be when the FINDBEGRNG call on the index might me running or extremely slow.

    We increased the ARRAYBUFSIZE to 100, added more memory did a defrag


    attachments show timestats on one job and PID process monitor sample

    Attachments
    John
    New Member
    Posts: 1
    New Member

      We are getting the same slowness with our system as part of our upgrade and conversion to Windows.   Did you ever find any solution to your issue?

       

      Thanks.

      AlanK
      Basic Member
      Posts: 16
      Basic Member
        This may be a little late but we had unexplained performance issues when we moved from V9 to V10 Windows Platform on VMs. Testing direct queries to the database resulted in significantly slower times on the newer setup though it had more resources. Issue turned out to be performance settings on the vm host servers.
        JimY
        Veteran Member
        Posts: 510
        Veteran Member
          Hi AlanK,
          What performance settings did you modify on the VM host? Thank you.
          AlanK
          Basic Member
          Posts: 16
          Basic Member
            Hi JimY,
            I did not get a screenshot of the settings but the server team referenced the BIOS max performance settings' on the host server. These settings should be the same as recommend by Epic for their host vm servers.

            HTH
            Alan
            JimY
            Veteran Member
            Posts: 510
            Veteran Member
              Thank you AlanK.
              rpowell460
              New Member
              Posts: 1
              New Member
                Is anyone running MS Hyper-v virtual machines. And encountering the same slowness with V10 as other have reported?