We have accepted the risk of not doing the "mingle -> inforos" install because we are in the middle of workday implementaion. I was asked to task the effort/time/money required take up this work if this cant be avoided in future.
A year ago, we have also went through an excercise of upgrading our LSF, Landmark(from 10 to 11) and inforos install by ourselves in one of our test environment but the issue we ran into was we were not able to setup LS as STS within Infor OS. We were told that we would need additional licensing for this and we were also told that this can be only done by Infor or their partners for extra cost. Is that still the case?
One other thought we had was, to NOT expose Infor OS URL to the users but only the LSF URL (we will still keep the Infor OS in our stack just in case if we were to reach out to Infor for Support). When you access InforOS (without the LS as STS) - it asks you to authenticate twice, one for InforOS and another LSF. Do you guys see any other risk with this approach?
We are currently bind to ldap. Do you guys see any foreseeing risk of us not doing this upgrade for next year or so and lose the ability to apply year end patches within Lawson S3? By the same time next year we will be in workday.