Prev
Next
Forums Infor / Lawson Platforms S3 Systems Administration

Need help in performance on Iseries for LSF9 both portal and LID

 4 Replies
 0 Subscribed to this topic
 27 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Author
Messages
normconger
New Member
Posts: 2
New Member
10/4/2009 12:26 AM

    We just did a skip upgrade from 7.2 to 9.0.0.4 on our Iseries.  The users are saying that jobs are running much longer.  I have done the various steps for tuning that Lawson recommends but the users still are experiencing delays.  Small jobs that used to take 2 minutes now take 8 minutes.  Does anyone have any ideas on what to try?

    mark.cook
    Veteran Member
    Posts: 444
    Veteran Member
    10/14/2009 11:54 AM
      We are not on I-series but did experience jobs running longer after installing ESP 7. There was a patch specifically for that issue. There might be a coresponding environment patch on I series for that issue.
      Lee
      Posts: 37
      12/11/2009 7:31 PM

        We've had similar issues (non i-series) with our current production; we resolve this as best that we can by using ~.cfg files on the new LSF 9.0.0.4; however, the only ones that we deal with are those that the users complain about.

        Jimmy Chiu
        Veteran Member
        Posts: 641
        Veteran Member
        12/15/2009 7:18 PM

          What's your server spec for your application server and database server? Especially physical memory available to the servers.

          A few things you can adjust that may help:
          - check your log files in "lawdir\system", are they ridiculously big? if so, rename and create new log file.
          - LADB.CFG, what's your "IDLETIME" set to?
          - check your WORK directory, does it need clean up?
          - LACONFIG, what's your "Windows Non-interactive Desktop Heap Size"?
           

          Jeano
          Basic Member
          Posts: 17
          Basic Member
          1/10/2010 6:14 PM

            I had the same issue when we did the same upgrade.  The problem for me was that the new 525 that we ordered didn't come with disk catching for the drives.  Performance went way down.  Once we ordered and install the 5727 Integrated cache feature all went well.

            Jean