Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Infor / Lawson Platforms
S3 Security
Security for the Rate field on PR36.1 screen
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Zac Shields
Past 24 Hours:
0
Prev. 24 Hours:
0
Overall:
5210
People Online:
Visitors:
253
Members:
0
Total:
253
Online Now:
New Topics
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Post Tax Benefit Plan Table
11/14/2024 9:16 PM
Hi, totally new to Laswon. I have a repor
Lawson S3 Procurement
ED501 Error: Map 850 not supported by /law/c15vda/lawson/test10/edi/bin/laws_out_91
11/12/2024 3:47 PM
Tried runnning ED501 and getting the atathced erro
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Error
11/6/2024 9:54 PM
When I try to enroll a retiree in 72.1 health plan
Infor ERP (Syteline)
Syteline: New Data Maintenance Wizard (Error) Need help
11/1/2024 4:24 PM
Hi, I need help with an error on syteline while us
Dealing with Lawson / Infor
Implementing Lawson v10 with Cerner Surginet, Case Cart Picking, and Quick Adds for the OR
10/29/2024 4:20 PM
Hi Everyone, I am wondering if there is any org
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Canada Tax Calculation (Federal and Provincial) Issue
10/23/2024 5:00 AM
Initially, we had problem with CPP2 calculation is
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
CA Section 125 401k Plan
10/22/2024 10:13 PM
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to fac
S3 Systems Administration
Running AC120 deleted records from ACMASTER table
10/22/2024 3:40 PM
We recently ran the AC120 as normal and somehow it
Lawson S3 Procurement
RQ13 Approval Info
10/17/2024 2:12 PM
When a Requisition is approved on RQ13, what table
S3 Customization/Development
Read and Write CSV file COBOL
10/9/2024 2:53 PM
Does anyone have a quik example of a program that
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3291
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1372
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Announcements
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Infor / Lawson Platforms
S3 Security
Security for the Rate field on PR36.1 screen
Please
login
to post a reply.
0 Replies
1
Subscribed to this topic
15 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
mfameree
New Member
Posts: 3
2/20/2019 1:41 PM
We need to open up security for payroll users to enter time records on the PR36.1 screen for process levels ending in '2' and '3', but these users are not allowed to see the pay rates for employees in these process levels. However, we still need the users to have the capability to enter dollar amounts in the rate field, so we can't completely remove security from the Rate field on PR36.1 for these process levels.
I've set up security rules to prevent these users from seeing the TRD-RATE field on process levels ending in '2' and '3'. It does not show up in drill-around. However, if I add a time record on PR36 and leave the RATE field blank, once I do an Inquire on the record, the TRD-RATE value still shows up on the PR36.1 screen.
I have the following rule set up on the TIMERECORD,RATE field:
If (user.attributeContains('ProcessLevelControl',trim(getDBField('EMPLOYEE','PROCESS-LEVEL',table.COMPANY,table.EMPLOYEE))))&&(subString(trim(getDBField('EMPLOYEE','PROCESS-LEVEL',table.COMPANY,table.EMPLOYEE)),4,1)=='1')
Then ALL_ACCESS
Else NO_ACCESS
Why does this rule not prevent the TRD-RATE value from showing up on PR36.1? I also tried setting a security rule on the PR36.1 TRD-RATE field to prevent access to the field if the last digit of the PROCESS-LEVEL is not '1', but this completely removes the field from the screen. As I mentioned earlier, we need the field on the screen for users to enter dollar amounts for these employees on occasion, we just don't want them to see the pay rate if they enter a record on PR36.1 for an hourly employee with process level ending in '2', leave the RATE field blank,and then inquire on the record. Any ideas on how to accomplish this?
We need to open up security for payroll users to enter time records on the PR36.1 screen for process levels ending in '2' and '3', but these users are not allowed to see the pay rates for employees in these process levels. However, we still need the users to have the capability to enter dollar amounts in the rate field, so we can't completely remove security from the Rate field on PR36.1 for these process levels.
I've set up security rules to prevent these users from seeing the TRD-RATE field on process levels ending in '2' and '3'. It does not show up in drill-around. However, if I add a time record on PR36 and leave the RATE field blank, once I do an Inquire on the record, the TRD-RATE value still shows up on the PR36.1 screen.
I have the following rule set up on the TIMERECORD,RATE field:
If (user.attributeContains('ProcessLevelControl',trim(getDBField('EMPLOYEE','PROCESS-LEVEL',table.COMPANY,table.EMPLOYEE))))&&(subString(trim(getDBField('EMPLOYEE','PROCESS-LEVEL',table.COMPANY,table.EMPLOYEE)),4,1)=='1')
Then ALL_ACCESS
Else NO_ACCESS
Why does this rule not prevent the TRD-RATE value from showing up on PR36.1? I also tried setting a security rule on the PR36.1 TRD-RATE field to prevent access to the field if the last digit of the PROCESS-LEVEL is not '1', but this completely removes the field from the screen. As I mentioned earlier, we need the field on the screen for users to enter dollar amounts on occasion, we just don't want them to see the pay rate if they enter a record on PR36.1 for an hourly employee with process level ending in '2', leave the RATE field blank,and then inquire on the record.
Please
login
to post a reply.