Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Supply Chain Management
Lawson S3 Supply Chain
Best Practice for processing Capital PO's
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Saef
Past 24 Hours:
0
Prev. 24 Hours:
0
Overall:
5226
People Online:
Visitors:
399
Members:
0
Total:
399
Online Now:
New Topics
S3 Systems Administration
ADFS certificate - new cert
12/3/2024 9:38 PM
The certificates on the windows boxes expired and
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Post Tax Benefit Plan Table
11/14/2024 9:16 PM
Hi, totally new to Laswon. I have a repor
Lawson S3 Procurement
ED501 Error: Map 850 not supported by /law/c15vda/lawson/test10/edi/bin/laws_out_91
11/12/2024 3:47 PM
Tried runnning ED501 and getting the atathced erro
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Error
11/6/2024 9:54 PM
When I try to enroll a retiree in 72.1 health plan
Infor ERP (Syteline)
Syteline: New Data Maintenance Wizard (Error) Need help
11/1/2024 4:24 PM
Hi, I need help with an error on syteline while us
Dealing with Lawson / Infor
Implementing Lawson v10 with Cerner Surginet, Case Cart Picking, and Quick Adds for the OR
10/29/2024 4:20 PM
Hi Everyone, I am wondering if there is any org
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Canada Tax Calculation (Federal and Provincial) Issue
10/23/2024 5:00 AM
Initially, we had problem with CPP2 calculation is
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
CA Section 125 401k Plan
10/22/2024 10:13 PM
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to fac
S3 Systems Administration
Running AC120 deleted records from ACMASTER table
10/22/2024 3:40 PM
We recently ran the AC120 as normal and somehow it
Lawson S3 Procurement
RQ13 Approval Info
10/17/2024 2:12 PM
When a Requisition is approved on RQ13, what table
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3291
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1372
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Announcements
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Supply Chain Management
Lawson S3 Supply Chain
Best Practice for processing Capital PO's
Please
login
to post a reply.
7 Replies
0
Subscribed to this topic
38 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
Bev Edwards
Veteran Member
Posts: 366
10/16/2013 7:10 PM
Currently, our buyer for Capital PO's is being directed to place $1.00 in the
Unit Cost
field and place the actual Unit Cost dollar amount in the
Quanitity
field on the PO20 form.
This was explained to me that this allows the managers of the particular capital budget for a project to be able to approve (match and pay) the invoice. It is designed to give the managers the control they seek over what gets paid against their capital budget balance.
I also heard that Hopkins handles their capital po's this way in Lawson. (Our department calls it the flip flop method,)
David Williams
Veteran Member
Posts: 1127
10/16/2013 8:09 PM
I would not say that is Best Practice - it requires receivers to be keyed in order for a 3 way match to occur. Are you using an approval process for invoices (like ProcessFlow)?
Michelle Wetzel
Veteran Member
Posts: 183
10/16/2013 8:46 PM
I have to agree with David. We considered it with our go live 5 years ago, especially for those POs where you don't actually know how much each invoice is going to be.
However, we use Service - Amount in those cases when it overlaps with a capital PO and keep it clean for reporting. We are able to report that we spent X with a company without having to do a side calculation to bring in the actual spend which is over in quantity.
Our process flow for approvals is pretty tight - for capital orders, it goes all the way up to the vice president if they us the capital account, regardless of the dollar value. This means the project lead is also seeing every order before they in turn approve it to go up the line. GL assigned accounts for us in the general ledger that we use as programming points: if someone orders using account 123 - process flow picks it up and sends it up one flow. If they use 456, it goes to a different one.
Bev Edwards
Veteran Member
Posts: 366
10/17/2013 1:01 PM
I wouldn't call it best practice either. My director and Purchasing manager wanted to know if there was a better way (best practice) to handle the Capitol PO process since the way they are doing it now seems to be causing some reporting issues.
I'm not familiar with Process Flow, at least not setting it up anyway. I've seen it and used to run a Process Flow for another process in another department, but that was established by by someone else, pehaps a consultant.
I'm not sure how the process flow that was mentioned by Michelle would be executed.
David Williams
Veteran Member
Posts: 1127
10/17/2013 1:29 PM
Bev - I mentioned ProcessFlow (for Invoice Approvals) as a way for managers to review the invoice before it is applied to their budgets. You can still do it the old fashioned way and have them approved prior to keying in AP.
Kat V
Veteran Member
Posts: 1020
10/23/2013 5:28 PM
We are keying in the Capitals with actual quantity and cost. There is a PO number range and code associated with the capitals and the activities tracking is turned on. This forces the invoices to route for approval prior to payment.
Julie
New Member
Posts: 1
11/1/2013 11:53 AM
We use a po code of "CAP" and have activities tracking turned on.
Bill Ianni
Veteran Member
Posts: 111
11/1/2013 5:48 PM
Anytime I see $1 in the unit cost field, I cringe. It is anything BUT best practice!
Please
login
to post a reply.