Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
User Experience
Lawson Add-Ins for Microsoft Office
Upload Wizard Add-in inquire first?
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Hitman
Past 24 Hours:
0
Prev. 24 Hours:
0
Overall:
5208
People Online:
Visitors:
301
Members:
0
Total:
301
Online Now:
New Topics
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Post Tax Benefit Plan Table
11/14/2024 9:16 PM
Hi, totally new to Laswon. I have a repor
Lawson S3 Procurement
ED501 Error: Map 850 not supported by /law/c15vda/lawson/test10/edi/bin/laws_out_91
11/12/2024 3:47 PM
Tried runnning ED501 and getting the atathced erro
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Error
11/6/2024 9:54 PM
When I try to enroll a retiree in 72.1 health plan
Infor ERP (Syteline)
Syteline: New Data Maintenance Wizard (Error) Need help
11/1/2024 4:24 PM
Hi, I need help with an error on syteline while us
Dealing with Lawson / Infor
Implementing Lawson v10 with Cerner Surginet, Case Cart Picking, and Quick Adds for the OR
10/29/2024 4:20 PM
Hi Everyone, I am wondering if there is any org
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Canada Tax Calculation (Federal and Provincial) Issue
10/23/2024 5:00 AM
Initially, we had problem with CPP2 calculation is
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
CA Section 125 401k Plan
10/22/2024 10:13 PM
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to fac
S3 Systems Administration
Running AC120 deleted records from ACMASTER table
10/22/2024 3:40 PM
We recently ran the AC120 as normal and somehow it
Lawson S3 Procurement
RQ13 Approval Info
10/17/2024 2:12 PM
When a Requisition is approved on RQ13, what table
S3 Customization/Development
Read and Write CSV file COBOL
10/9/2024 2:53 PM
Does anyone have a quik example of a program that
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3291
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1372
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Announcements
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
User Experience
Lawson Add-Ins for Microsoft Office
Upload Wizard Add-in inquire first?
Please
login
to post a reply.
5 Replies
0
Subscribed to this topic
1 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
Seth
Basic Member
Posts: 4
6/20/2007 4:38 AM
Is there a way to generate an "inquire" action from the spreadsheet?
Scenario:
Trying to add lines to an agreement using PO25.6
Results of "Add first, then change" are I | 12345 (item number)
Manually entering information from form returns "Must inquire before using that function" in portal
Used formdef to find "key" to this form and included it on spreadsheet
Thanks for any help.
John Henley
Posts: 3353
6/20/2007 2:25 PM
Seth, The addins automatically do an implicit Inquire when you do a Change action via the addins. Since you tried the 'Add then Change option', it looks like you need to just do the Change only.
I haven't uploaded to that particular form, but you should be able to as long as you are populating all of the appropriate fields.
One way to verify is to capture the AGS call when you are doing this in Portal, and then match up the _f* fields from the AGS call to your addins upload ...
Seth
Basic Member
Posts: 4
6/20/2007 6:15 PM
Thanks for you help and for clarifying about the implicit Inquire.
Unfortunately, I am still unable to Upload... the last few line of the AGS call give me this:
_f1
127
Field is required
From near the top:
<_f0>PO25.6
<_f1 />
-OR-
PO25.6
I would interpret that _f1/FC field to be "Function Code," but that doesn't make sense since each row can have it's own function (theoretically).
The more important issue, is that my Add-in doesnt' seem to have a mapping to _f1, unless its "Left Column Check." My map listing goes directly from the hidden _f0 to _f2.
The more "normal" way for me to access 25.6 is to go through 25.1 and click "lines." When I try this then go to the Transaction XML (through ctrl-alt-a) and try to Perform Query, Lawson returns a message about the query string being over 2000 characters. I can at that point see that the _f1 field is populated with "I."
***Edit
I see this in formdev:
Field("_f1","Fc",01,"fldnm=FC","row=00","col=09","edit=upper","req=true","value=I","select=true" );
sV("+","PageDown");
sV("-","PageUp");
sV("C","Change");
sV("I","Inquire");
but I don't know how it may apply to this situation
/Edit***
Again, thanks for your help.
John Henley
Posts: 3353
6/20/2007 6:59 PM
Don't confuse FC (form function code) with LINE-FC (line function code).
The Addins query wizard option (Add, Add then Change, Delete) fills the FC.
What you're probably missing is that you need to map to the LINE-FC (_f17 / LINE-FC1).
Remember how it works with Portal and LID: You're doing an ADD on the LINE, but a CHANGE on the FORM.
Seth
Basic Member
Posts: 4
6/20/2007 7:44 PM
Too right!
I did confuse those.
I think I'm all mapped correctly now, but I don't know how to interpret the response from the upload. Lawson returns the item number.
When I check the form through portal, the add has not been completed, so something is not right. I want to see "Change Complete - Continue." Just to get it done, I may go manually at this point (ugh).
You are the MASTER, John. Thanks for your help!
Seth
Basic Member
Posts: 4
6/22/2007 2:26 PM
A-ha!
When uploading to PO25.6 one needs to include _f21 PVN-VEN-ITEM even though it's not required when editing through the portal.
I had preivously uploaded PO13 information, so didn't expect to need the Vendor Item on this form / upload.
A note when adding No Charge, Cost Option 2 items to PO25.6:
I got an error saying that I couldn't add a cost when using Cost Option 2, which was interesting since I didn't even map that column. I went back and included a cost column, albeit zero, and the upload worked.
The records that returned the item number on this upload (2 of 120) turned out not to have a PO13 record built for the vendor associated with this Agreement.
John, thanks again for your help on this.
Seth
Please
login
to post a reply.