Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Integration / Customization
IPA/ProcessFlow
Reminder Emails in ProcessFlow
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Wayne
Past 24 Hours:
1
Prev. 24 Hours:
1
Overall:
5121
People Online:
Visitors:
386
Members:
0
Total:
386
Online Now:
New Topics
S3 Systems Administration
Using MFA for Lawson S3 Access
5/8/2024 1:23 PM
Does anyone use Multi Factor Authentication when u
Lawson Landmark
Executing IPA from PR160
5/3/2024 2:46 PM
We're facing a situation where we need to upda
IPA/ProcessFlow
Executing IPA from PR160
5/3/2024 2:46 PM
We're facing a situation where we need to upda
S3 Customization/Development
Cobol - Extract Current Time
4/24/2024 7:21 PM
How do you extract just the Current System Time in
Lawson Landmark
LPL INSTR Functions
4/5/2024 8:32 PM
I'm writing a simple report using the Create R
Infor SCM
Translating 856 to get the ~ REF^CN^ field
4/3/2024 8:24 PM
We are trying to get the tracking number which is
IPA/ProcessFlow
Sample XML file create Flow
4/3/2024 3:43 PM
Hello everyone, I am new to creating XML files
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
bn105 error message
3/26/2024 6:40 PM
I need to change some of the set ups in our Life I
IPA/ProcessFlow
IPA executing Job
3/13/2024 7:08 PM
New to the IPA world and was wondering, can an IPA
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Life Age Reduction on benefits plans
3/12/2024 7:15 PM
For our optional life we have an age based coverag
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3288
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1354
Roger French
1311
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Unanswered
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
IPA/ProcessFlow
Reminder Emails in ProcessFlow
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author
Messages
pfguy
Basic Member
Posts: 14
5/6/2010 1:47 PM
I have placed a variable in the user section for reminders, and the clickled on user. The send reminders to all userd that did not take an action is checked. Without this checked, the default email on the white space, properties is what is sent. When checked it sends the reminder msg as the body for the email.
The variable is enclosed ie: <!userid>. I'm finding that its sending an email to more users than just the userid in the variable. Eevn without the, "ALL users that did not take an action box", unchecked.. Does anyone have any experience with Reminder notices for LSF9.... We go live shortly....
Thank You in advance.
TBonney
Veteran Member
Posts: 280
5/6/2010 2:41 PM
sorry pfguy...
We do use reminders in LSF9, but we've never tried using a vaiable to designate only certain recipients. We simply take advantage of the option "remind all users that did not take action", based on the rationale that if none of the original recipients has acted on it yet, all of them should know that it is still awaiting their approval/rejection action.
Shane Jones
Veteran Member
Posts: 460
5/15/2010 2:28 AM
I had to think about this one a bit but I have a thought.
Is the variable defined in the SERVICE or just in the start node and then how is it assigned within the flow? In other words is the value stored in "PF Admin" as a workunit variable... If the value is determined in the flow and then used dynamically while the flow is running you might be losing the value when it is needed. Flows can not use dynamic variables after a USERACTION node. If you do not "store" the value within the workunit variables it will not know the value when you are trying to use it. Check one of the Workunits that did not work to see if the workunit variables in PF Admin shows the correct value.
Hope this is the issue - because it is easy to fix with a node to store/save the value to the variable within PF Admin. This is all I could think of because we have a flow where we needed to write the value to the Workunit because the flow would lose the value after it waits at a UserAction node........
KK - Infor
Veteran Member
Posts: 61
6/1/2010 3:45 PM
pfguy,
I agree with what Shane has said above.
One more thing you would like to check, is how are the user id's formatted in the <!userid> variable.
I would test it in two ways
- just the comma separated RMIDs
- RMID+'('+ NAME+')' - Since this is the format that is picked up if you click on Search in Select Users Window.
Hope this helps!
KK
You are not authorized to post a reply.