Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Enterprise Resource Planning & Manufacturing
Lawson S3 Procurement
PO20 If/when to Issue Final?
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Saef
Past 24 Hours:
0
Prev. 24 Hours:
0
Overall:
5226
People Online:
Visitors:
468
Members:
0
Total:
468
Online Now:
New Topics
S3 Systems Administration
ADFS certificate - new cert
12/3/2024 9:38 PM
The certificates on the windows boxes expired and
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Post Tax Benefit Plan Table
11/14/2024 9:16 PM
Hi, totally new to Laswon. I have a repor
Lawson S3 Procurement
ED501 Error: Map 850 not supported by /law/c15vda/lawson/test10/edi/bin/laws_out_91
11/12/2024 3:47 PM
Tried runnning ED501 and getting the atathced erro
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Error
11/6/2024 9:54 PM
When I try to enroll a retiree in 72.1 health plan
Infor ERP (Syteline)
Syteline: New Data Maintenance Wizard (Error) Need help
11/1/2024 4:24 PM
Hi, I need help with an error on syteline while us
Dealing with Lawson / Infor
Implementing Lawson v10 with Cerner Surginet, Case Cart Picking, and Quick Adds for the OR
10/29/2024 4:20 PM
Hi Everyone, I am wondering if there is any org
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Canada Tax Calculation (Federal and Provincial) Issue
10/23/2024 5:00 AM
Initially, we had problem with CPP2 calculation is
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
CA Section 125 401k Plan
10/22/2024 10:13 PM
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to fac
S3 Systems Administration
Running AC120 deleted records from ACMASTER table
10/22/2024 3:40 PM
We recently ran the AC120 as normal and somehow it
Lawson S3 Procurement
RQ13 Approval Info
10/17/2024 2:12 PM
When a Requisition is approved on RQ13, what table
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3291
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1372
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Announcements
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Enterprise Resource Planning & Manufacturing
Lawson S3 Procurement
PO20 If/when to Issue Final?
Please
login
to post a reply.
4 Replies
0
Subscribed to this topic
1 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
brupp
Veteran Member
Posts: 165
8/8/2014 2:08 PM
Hello - One of our Expeditors asked me about the Issue Final function & the timing of when it should be used. I believe that we typically Issue Final immediately after releasing a non-EDI PO, but perhaps better practice would be to wait until the confirmation is worked.
Any information/recommendations would be appreciated!
Thanks & Happy Friday!
Beth
Kat V
Veteran Member
Posts: 1020
8/8/2014 3:48 PM
Issue Final is the only way to transmit Fax Email or EDI - so we use it in your first "Immediate Release" scenario. Our buyers are actually tracked by length of time from PO Creation to Issue Final and shorter is better. If you wait until confirmation - what do you do with the vendors that do not confirm anything?
brupp
Veteran Member
Posts: 165
8/8/2014 5:52 PM
Hi Kat - We do not use Lawson's EDI program, but you've answered my question. I was not aware that Issue Final was critical to issue via fax or email. And good point about those wonderful vendors who never confirm...Have you ever had a case where you tried to update the Item Detail field & Replace would not work? We received the error "Cannot Replace item, origin is not RQ". That's what brought up this question to do with Issue Final.
JonA
Veteran Member
Posts: 1163
8/8/2014 5:58 PM
Our buyers only issue final for POs that they want to print for whatever reason. But for most POs the buyers don't issue at all and the PO120 jobs pick them up for faxing, email or EDI. For the POs for vendors that are set at paper issue I have a PO120 job that runs nightly to issue those. If I remember right, when we were on 8.0.3 the PO audit tracking didn't kick in until after the PO was issued. There's probably no real reason to have that PO120 job anymore. For buyer metrics we track the time from req approval to PO line creation and req to receipt.
Kat V
Veteran Member
Posts: 1020
8/12/2014 6:36 PM
"Cannot Replace item, origin is not RQ" - yes - the replace item function was dreamt up by Lawson as an inventory solution. As a result, it will only allow changes to items where the PO Line Source is system code RQ. If the PO line was created on PO20, then it is source "PO" and cannot be changed once you've issued the PO. My buyers have reported that the "first" replace can break the tie to the req and any subsequent changes can generate that error.
In those instances, we update VEN-ITEM and not Item-Detail - you'll get warnings there, but for the most part it allows the change. The invoice matching is setup to look at VEN-ITEM.
In Jon's scenario, the PO120 is what is Issuing Final - and you'd have the same issues with updating as you have now without a req number.
Please
login
to post a reply.