Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Human Capital Management
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Absence Plan payout by percentage
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Saef
Past 24 Hours:
0
Prev. 24 Hours:
0
Overall:
5226
People Online:
Visitors:
257
Members:
0
Total:
257
Online Now:
New Topics
S3 Systems Administration
ADFS certificate - new cert
12/3/2024 9:38 PM
The certificates on the windows boxes expired and
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Post Tax Benefit Plan Table
11/14/2024 9:16 PM
Hi, totally new to Laswon. I have a repor
Lawson S3 Procurement
ED501 Error: Map 850 not supported by /law/c15vda/lawson/test10/edi/bin/laws_out_91
11/12/2024 3:47 PM
Tried runnning ED501 and getting the atathced erro
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Error
11/6/2024 9:54 PM
When I try to enroll a retiree in 72.1 health plan
Infor ERP (Syteline)
Syteline: New Data Maintenance Wizard (Error) Need help
11/1/2024 4:24 PM
Hi, I need help with an error on syteline while us
Dealing with Lawson / Infor
Implementing Lawson v10 with Cerner Surginet, Case Cart Picking, and Quick Adds for the OR
10/29/2024 4:20 PM
Hi Everyone, I am wondering if there is any org
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Canada Tax Calculation (Federal and Provincial) Issue
10/23/2024 5:00 AM
Initially, we had problem with CPP2 calculation is
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
CA Section 125 401k Plan
10/22/2024 10:13 PM
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to fac
S3 Systems Administration
Running AC120 deleted records from ACMASTER table
10/22/2024 3:40 PM
We recently ran the AC120 as normal and somehow it
Lawson S3 Procurement
RQ13 Approval Info
10/17/2024 2:12 PM
When a Requisition is approved on RQ13, what table
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3291
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1372
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Announcements
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Human Capital Management
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Absence Plan payout by percentage
Please
login
to post a reply.
4 Replies
0
Subscribed to this topic
68 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
Colleen Bertagnolli
Veteran Member
Posts: 58
5/7/2014 5:46 PM
We are exploring the option of absence plan payouts by % - depending on an employees length of stay at time of termination (i.e. 0% for less than 1 year, 25% for under 2 years). Has anyone done this and how was it accomplished?
Thanks
Kelly H
Veteran Member
Posts: 167
5/7/2014 5:54 PM
I am curious to see the responses you get as we pay ours out manually. Our employees get one more check after their final check wtih their PTO payout on it.
Colleen Bertagnolli
Veteran Member
Posts: 58
5/7/2014 6:13 PM
We normally run the LP130 but that has no option for percentage - it is all, or only current cycle
Margie Gyurisin
Veteran Member
Posts: 538
5/7/2014 6:32 PM
We have a plan that gets a percentage paid out. It is done manually using a special pay code that only decrements the plan. The seperate pay code also allows us to carve out those hours/dollars when doing statistical reports.
Mary Porter
Veteran Member
Posts: 337
10/14/2015 6:21 PM
Colleen - we recently started running the LP130 and have a question. The LP130 records a Transaction Type 63 LP130 Transaction which is a positive number.
The employee's balance shows as 0. If the Master End Date is removed from LP31 and LP140 is run with Retroactive accruals, it puts a negative Transaction Type 61 PTO Payout on the LP64 for the same amount as the LP130 Transaction. Since the Employee's balance is 0, does the employee's balance become negative when LP197 is run? This is the first encounter with someone that doesn't have a master end date but we need to know because anyone that rehires would have the same issue.
Please
login
to post a reply.