Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Human Capital Management
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
EMSS Managers and Process Flow for Personnel Actions
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Raju
Past 24 Hours:
0
Prev. 24 Hours:
1
Overall:
5205
People Online:
Visitors:
283
Members:
0
Total:
283
Online Now:
New Topics
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Post Tax Benefit Plan Table
11/14/2024 9:16 PM
Hi, totally new to Laswon. I have a repor
Lawson S3 Procurement
ED501 Error: Map 850 not supported by /law/c15vda/lawson/test10/edi/bin/laws_out_91
11/12/2024 3:47 PM
Tried runnning ED501 and getting the atathced erro
Lawson Smart Office
Error
11/6/2024 9:54 PM
When I try to enroll a retiree in 72.1 health plan
Infor CloudSuite
Syteline: New Data Maintenance Wizard (Error) Need help
11/1/2024 4:39 PM
Hi, I need help with an error on syteline while us
Infor ERP (Syteline)
Syteline: New Data Maintenance Wizard (Error) Need help
11/1/2024 4:24 PM
Hi, I need help with an error on syteline while us
Dealing with Lawson / Infor
Implementing Lawson v10 with Cerner Surginet, Case Cart Picking, and Quick Adds for the OR
10/29/2024 4:20 PM
Hi Everyone, I am wondering if there is any org
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Canada Tax Calculation (Federal and Provincial) Issue
10/23/2024 5:00 AM
Initially, we had problem with CPP2 calculation is
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
CA Section 125 401k Plan
10/22/2024 10:13 PM
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to fac
S3 Systems Administration
Running AC120 deleted records from ACMASTER table
10/22/2024 3:40 PM
We recently ran the AC120 as normal and somehow it
Lawson S3 Procurement
RQ13 Approval Info
10/17/2024 2:12 PM
When a Requisition is approved on RQ13, what table
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3291
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1372
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Announcements
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Human Capital Management
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
EMSS Managers and Process Flow for Personnel Actions
Please
login
to post a reply.
5 Replies
0
Subscribed to this topic
68 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
TRACY
Veteran Member
Posts: 58
1/17/2012 9:23 PM
Does anyone know that uses EMSS for managers to put in personnel actions for their direct reports if there is a way to route those pending actions to HR for approval? I was thinking you had to have Process Flow (which we don't), but wanted some other opinions/ideas, thanks.
LisaN
Veteran Member
Posts: 53
1/17/2012 9:57 PM
We use process flow for the approvals.
Shane Jones
Veteran Member
Posts: 460
1/18/2012 2:28 AM
We use Process Flow (Integrator) as well... I wish I could think of a creative solution but the only thing I can think of is integrating the information with SharePoint???? However, I would not use this because it would open my data up to a new system and I am not convinced that you could build the same processes that you can build in Process Flow.
Good Luck!!!
stephanie
Veteran Member
Posts: 330
1/18/2012 9:19 AM
Hi Tracy - another way to get approval would be to use the flag on PA50 "Web Immediate = N". That would put the action into pending status, and it would be updated via PA100. Unfortunately, it doesn't route the action anywhere, but HR COULD be accountable for reviewing the output before it's updated. Good luck!
Shane Jones
Veteran Member
Posts: 460
1/18/2012 11:56 AM
Stephane got me thinking..... Does the table behind PA50 show a field for who did last change to the action? If it logs the user that performed the change action on PA50 you could track the approval by who performs the update on the PA50 - a bit of a longshot...
TRACY
Veteran Member
Posts: 58
1/18/2012 12:28 PM
Thanks all for your responses. We do have our PA52 actions all set to pending and have 2 people review before running in update to please the auditors, so looks like process flow would be needed unless we want to build some custom programs.
Please
login
to post a reply.