Prev
Next
Forums Human Capital Management Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits

LP130 error stopped on exit 23

 7 Replies
 1 Subscribed to this topic
 68 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Author
Messages
Margie Gyurisin
Veteran Member
Posts: 538
Veteran Member
2/11/2015 10:03 PM

    We want to use LP130 to create LP payouts. I ran the LP140 and then the LP130. It ran okay in report mode but will not run in update mode. The job goes into "needs recovery" with the error message - "stopped on Exit23".

    Have you encountered this? What was your fix?

    Mary Porter
    Veteran Member
    Posts: 337
    Veteran Member
    2/12/2015 1:38 AM
      Margie - this may (and probably is) unrelated, but did you see KB 1197479 - it was for a PA102 with a Stopped On Exit 23 error but who knows it might apply?
      I have been wanting to try LP140/LP130 with payroll so let me know how yours turned out. I had tried it at previous employment and it worked
      really nicely but we never got it into production.
      Margie Gyurisin
      Veteran Member
      Posts: 538
      Veteran Member
      2/12/2015 12:06 PM
        I saw that article, had my IT person look and he did not think it applied. I do have an open case. Just looking for a quicker solution.

        Thank you for your response.
        Mary Porter
        Veteran Member
        Posts: 337
        Veteran Member
        8/26/2015 5:19 PM
          Margie - did you ever get this resolved? We are going to start testing - is your sequence PR132, LP140, LP197, LP130, LP197, PR140, PR160 PR197 PR198 (or something like that?)
          Margie Gyurisin
          Veteran Member
          Posts: 538
          Veteran Member
          8/26/2015 7:40 PM
            We did not. A recommendation was made to load some CTPs etc and try again but we were going to begin our ACA work and did/do not have the resources to dedicate to it right now. I don't believe I would run the first LP197 you have listed. The Lawson documentation has the order as this - LP140, LP130, PR140, PR160, PR197 and LP197. Of course PR132 should be run before a PR140.
            Mary Porter
            Veteran Member
            Posts: 337
            Veteran Member
            8/27/2015 2:26 AM
              You are so right, I was looking at a different page in the documentation that showed an LP197 in the middle but it was for non-payroll cycles. We finished testing today and LP140, LP130 and then PR140 worked really well.
              Tim Kraynak
              New Member
              Posts: 3
              New Member
              7/27/2018 7:51 PM

                Mary:

                Can you provide me the correct sequence to run this within the PR cycle? I can get it to run with LP140, LP130, LP197, PR132, PR132, PR160 ,PR197. I want to run it with the LP197 at the end (not in the middle) but I keep getting LP00 errors (LP payment not complete). I don't want to run a LP197 right after the LP140/:P130 because that would post all other LP action, which I think is risky (no fallback for corrections. How do you do this?

                 

                thanks 

                Brittany G
                Advanced Member
                Posts: 23
                Advanced Member
                8/10/2018 4:56 PM
                  My payroll run is:
                  PR530 - PR135 - PR134 - PR137- PR138 - LP140 - LP130 - PR132 - PR140 -PR160 - PR141 - Custom jobs - PR195 - PR197 - PR198 - LP197 - LP198 (monthly)