Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Integration / Customization
IPA/ProcessFlow
Submitting PA52 as immediate
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Raju
Past 24 Hours:
1
Prev. 24 Hours:
1
Overall:
5205
People Online:
Visitors:
219
Members:
0
Total:
219
Online Now:
New Topics
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Post Tax Benefit Plan Table
11/14/2024 9:16 PM
Hi, totally new to Laswon. I have a repor
Lawson S3 Procurement
ED501 Error: Map 850 not supported by /law/c15vda/lawson/test10/edi/bin/laws_out_91
11/12/2024 3:47 PM
Tried runnning ED501 and getting the atathced erro
Lawson Smart Office
Error
11/6/2024 9:54 PM
When I try to enroll a retiree in 72.1 health plan
Infor CloudSuite
Syteline: New Data Maintenance Wizard (Error) Need help
11/1/2024 4:39 PM
Hi, I need help with an error on syteline while us
Infor ERP (Syteline)
Syteline: New Data Maintenance Wizard (Error) Need help
11/1/2024 4:24 PM
Hi, I need help with an error on syteline while us
Dealing with Lawson / Infor
Implementing Lawson v10 with Cerner Surginet, Case Cart Picking, and Quick Adds for the OR
10/29/2024 4:20 PM
Hi Everyone, I am wondering if there is any org
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Canada Tax Calculation (Federal and Provincial) Issue
10/23/2024 5:00 AM
Initially, we had problem with CPP2 calculation is
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
CA Section 125 401k Plan
10/22/2024 10:13 PM
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to fac
S3 Systems Administration
Running AC120 deleted records from ACMASTER table
10/22/2024 3:40 PM
We recently ran the AC120 as normal and somehow it
Lawson S3 Procurement
RQ13 Approval Info
10/17/2024 2:12 PM
When a Requisition is approved on RQ13, what table
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3291
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1369
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Announcements
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Integration / Customization
IPA/ProcessFlow
Submitting PA52 as immediate
Please
login
to post a reply.
4 Replies
1
Subscribed to this topic
52 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
George Graham
Veteran Member
Posts: 201
2/14/2012 5:40 AM
Has anyone been able to submit a PA52 transaction as an Immediate action through an ags call?I keep getting the message:
Warning! Action will be immediate; OK to continue
I've tried different combinations to bypass the manual requirement when doing this directly through PA52 of having to confirm the add - but can't seem to get past this confirmation step. Here is the call that is being made:
servlet/Router/Transaction/Erp?_PDL=LAWPROD&_TKN=PA52.1&_EVT=CHG&_RTN=DATA&_LFN=ALL&_TDS=IGNORE&FC=Add&PCT-EMPLOYEE=99999&PCT-ACTION-CODE=ETHNICITY&PCT-EFFECT-DATE=20120213&PCT-COMPANY=1&PCT-NEW-VALUE-1r0=W&IMMEDIATE-ACTION=Y&XMIT-IMMED=0&PCT-ACTION-NBR=2&_DELIM=%09&_OUT=XML&_EOT=TRUE
David Burnham
Basic Member
Posts: 9
2/14/2012 12:56 PM
We have several calls to PA52 that process immediate.
The short answer is to add "&XMIT-IMMED=1" to your call.
The longer answer is that there are a number of warnings and conditions that you can recieve from PA52. If you do a series of calls to Lawson in Internet Explorer (https://
:
/servlet/Router/transaction/Erp?
) just like you would process the screen and examine changes to the hidden fields in the data returned. Doing so with the above example will show that after an Inquiry the XMIT-IMMED field would be a "0". After the change, it would be a "1" with the message of "...Ok to continue". You then change the field to a 1 and the transaction will process.
Using this method you can either just anticipate the override ahead of time or put the transaction in a loop and interigate for the fields in question. We use this method to capture the warning about Tax errors when doing position changes. when the warning is encountered, the process flow will notify the staffer of the error so that they can make the nessisary changes on PR13.8, but the flow will not stop, it set's the switch and resubmitts the transaction.
Tim Cochrane
Veteran Member
Posts: 154
2/14/2012 2:02 PM
Setting the XMIT blocks to 1's will bypass soft warnings.
_PDL=&_TKN=PA52.1&_EVT=CHG&_RTN=DATA&_LFN=ALL&_TDS=IGNORE&FC=Add&PCT-COMPANY=&PCT-EMPLOYEE=&PCT-ACTION-CODE=1LOACHANGE&PCT-EFFECT-DATE=&PCT-REASON1=LOA-LWNB&PCT-REASON2=X-ONBEHALF&PCT-NEW-VALUE-1r0=LOA-LWNB&USER-ID=lawson&PCT-ACTION-NBR=&XMIT-HREMP-BLOCK=1111111111&XMIT-PAPEP-BLOCK=1111111111&_DELIM=%09&_OUT=XML&_EOT=TRUE
SP
Veteran Member
Posts: 122
2/14/2012 2:31 PM
As David mentioned, the short answer may simply be related to using the
XMIT_IMMED values correctly.
A longer more detailed answer can be found by carefully reading Kbase
articles 1037326, 558814, and 555550
Anytime I need to build an AGS call, I always start by pulling up the form
(with or without data poplulated) and perform a "ctr+shft-V"
Ctr-shft-V is your friend. From here you can click the Req Coll values to
find out exactly what fields comprise the hidden key. You can also access
the Name Coll to find out exactly what _f value to use for the specific
fields. And probably most important, you can see access the Trans XML
screen to see exactly what fields were holding what data, including the
hidden key at the bottom.
Please note that there was a patch recently (I forget the exact CTP) which
added action-nbr to the hidden key (actually it added action-key which is
one less than the number displayed on the form).
Hope this helps,
In my experience, the best thing to do is to use the "_f123" values instead
of field names. Some might disagree with this approach, but it's the
easiest way I've found
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:48 AM,
wrote:
> [image: LawsonGuru.com Logo] <
https://www.lawsonguru.com/
> Lawson
> ProcessFlow Forum Notification A message was posted to a thread you are
> tracking. *Submitting PA52 as immediate* Posted by: *George Graham*
> 02/14/2012 12:40 AM
> Has anyone been able to submit a PA52 transaction as an Immediate action
> through an ags call?I keep getting the message:
>
> **Warning! Action will be immediate; OK to continue**
>
> I've tried different combinations to bypass the manual requirement when
> doing this directly through PA52 of having to confirm the add - but can't
> seem to get past this confirmation step. Here is the call that is being
> made:
>
> servlet/Router/Transaction/Erp?_PDL=LAWPROD&_TKN=PA52.1&_EVT=CHG&_RTN=DATA&_LFN=ALL&_TDS=IGNORE&FC=Add&PCT-EMPLOYEE=99999&PCT-ACTION-CODE=ETHNICITY&PCT-EFFECT-DATE=20120213&PCT-COMPANY=1&PCT-NEW-VALUE-1r0=W&IMMEDIATE-ACTION=Y&XMIT-IMMED=0&PCT-ACTION-NBR=2&_DELIM=%09&_OUT=XML&_EOT=TRUE
>
> ------------------------------
>
> To view the complete thread and reply via your browser, please visit:
>
>
https://www.lawsonguru.co...g-pa52-as-immediate/
>
> You were sent this email because you opted to receive email notifications
> when someone posted and/or responded to a message on this forum.
> To unsubscribe to this thread please visit your user profile page and
> change your subscription options.
>
> Thank you,
> LawsonGuru.com
>
George Graham
Veteran Member
Posts: 201
2/14/2012 11:10 PM
If I can leverage this same thread - how about submission to PA52.5 to move a position? When trying to do the add its coming back with the message to "Perform the Move From Level special action" - which is the V function - but that function is NOT the add function. its what populates the new position values that you are moving to. So - in this same light - is there a value that needs to be set on the FC=A to pass this message (assuming the new position values are part of the ags call).
Have submitted the transaction through portal with the trace debugger on to see if I can find the values that are part of the ags but just not seeing it.
Please
login
to post a reply.