Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Integration / Customization
IPA/ProcessFlow
Work unit sometimes does not update PA53
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Raju
Past 24 Hours:
1
Prev. 24 Hours:
1
Overall:
5205
People Online:
Visitors:
300
Members:
0
Total:
300
Online Now:
New Topics
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Post Tax Benefit Plan Table
11/14/2024 9:16 PM
Hi, totally new to Laswon. I have a repor
Lawson S3 Procurement
ED501 Error: Map 850 not supported by /law/c15vda/lawson/test10/edi/bin/laws_out_91
11/12/2024 3:47 PM
Tried runnning ED501 and getting the atathced erro
Lawson Smart Office
Error
11/6/2024 9:54 PM
When I try to enroll a retiree in 72.1 health plan
Infor CloudSuite
Syteline: New Data Maintenance Wizard (Error) Need help
11/1/2024 4:39 PM
Hi, I need help with an error on syteline while us
Infor ERP (Syteline)
Syteline: New Data Maintenance Wizard (Error) Need help
11/1/2024 4:24 PM
Hi, I need help with an error on syteline while us
Dealing with Lawson / Infor
Implementing Lawson v10 with Cerner Surginet, Case Cart Picking, and Quick Adds for the OR
10/29/2024 4:20 PM
Hi Everyone, I am wondering if there is any org
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Canada Tax Calculation (Federal and Provincial) Issue
10/23/2024 5:00 AM
Initially, we had problem with CPP2 calculation is
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
CA Section 125 401k Plan
10/22/2024 10:13 PM
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to fac
S3 Systems Administration
Running AC120 deleted records from ACMASTER table
10/22/2024 3:40 PM
We recently ran the AC120 as normal and somehow it
Lawson S3 Procurement
RQ13 Approval Info
10/17/2024 2:12 PM
When a Requisition is approved on RQ13, what table
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3291
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1369
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Announcements
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Integration / Customization
IPA/ProcessFlow
Work unit sometimes does not update PA53
Please
login
to post a reply.
3 Replies
0
Subscribed to this topic
52 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
BarbR
Veteran Member
Posts: 306
12/6/2011 6:50 PM
We occasionally (maybe once every 2 to 4 weeks) find that the PA53 AGS transaction in the work unit does not update the Approval flag to Y. Everything in the work unit and IOS log looks normal. I can cut the AGS transaction call string out of the work unit and paste it in the PF Designer and run it and it works perfectly. This happens on different Personnel Actions and submitted by different users (and the same PA's with the same users work perfectly most of the time). I can find no pattern. Has anyone else experienced this?
jamesraceson
Veteran Member
Posts: 52
12/6/2011 7:47 PM
Barb,
Yes I have. There is no "pattern", but sometimes it depends on how much traffic is going on that I have seen it not update sometimes. There will never be any "errors", but it will not update sometimes. What I have found that works is to put in a short query after your update section and see if the update worked. Then put a branch node to check for the wanted condition. If true, continue on. If false, have it go back around and run the update section again.
BarbR
Veteran Member
Posts: 306
12/6/2011 8:03 PM
Thanks for your reply - it's good to know I'm not the only one - I've opened several cases with Lawson to no avail. Your idea is a good one, but since I can't make it happen on demand I don't know how I'd be able to test the new nodes. Also a daunting task as we have 23 work-flow enabled PA's, which means 46 flows (test and prod).
jamesraceson
Veteran Member
Posts: 52
12/6/2011 9:08 PM
Barb,
One way to put a dent in the task is to creat a function to handle most of the query calls and save it to the pflow.js file. Inside the function (passing what variables needed) you could have it make the query call to the database, check for your conditions, and then return a true/false. This way it would be a smaller footprint in your existing flows, cut down on the amount of work that you would have to do and would not increase the amount of workunits that are created. Just a thought...
Please
login
to post a reply.