Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Integration / Customization
IPA/ProcessFlow
Workunit Folder for WorkObject
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Raju
Past 24 Hours:
0
Prev. 24 Hours:
1
Overall:
5205
People Online:
Visitors:
215
Members:
0
Total:
215
Online Now:
New Topics
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Post Tax Benefit Plan Table
11/14/2024 9:16 PM
Hi, totally new to Laswon. I have a repor
Lawson S3 Procurement
ED501 Error: Map 850 not supported by /law/c15vda/lawson/test10/edi/bin/laws_out_91
11/12/2024 3:47 PM
Tried runnning ED501 and getting the atathced erro
Lawson Smart Office
Error
11/6/2024 9:54 PM
When I try to enroll a retiree in 72.1 health plan
Infor CloudSuite
Syteline: New Data Maintenance Wizard (Error) Need help
11/1/2024 4:39 PM
Hi, I need help with an error on syteline while us
Infor ERP (Syteline)
Syteline: New Data Maintenance Wizard (Error) Need help
11/1/2024 4:24 PM
Hi, I need help with an error on syteline while us
Dealing with Lawson / Infor
Implementing Lawson v10 with Cerner Surginet, Case Cart Picking, and Quick Adds for the OR
10/29/2024 4:20 PM
Hi Everyone, I am wondering if there is any org
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Canada Tax Calculation (Federal and Provincial) Issue
10/23/2024 5:00 AM
Initially, we had problem with CPP2 calculation is
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
CA Section 125 401k Plan
10/22/2024 10:13 PM
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to fac
S3 Systems Administration
Running AC120 deleted records from ACMASTER table
10/22/2024 3:40 PM
We recently ran the AC120 as normal and somehow it
Lawson S3 Procurement
RQ13 Approval Info
10/17/2024 2:12 PM
When a Requisition is approved on RQ13, what table
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3291
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1369
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Announcements
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Integration / Customization
IPA/ProcessFlow
Workunit Folder for WorkObject
Please
login
to post a reply.
3 Replies
0
Subscribed to this topic
52 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
cBreeze
Basic Member
Posts: 20
5/28/2013 2:25 PM
I have a Requisition approval PF. This creates a Work Unit. (And a Work Folder for that unit- that can be seen in PF admin linked to RQ10)
If it is a specific type of req (by Vendor#), I go to a Work Object and call the 2nd PF. This creates another Work Unit, but not a Work Folder record.
I pass almost all of the variable in the workObject and they show up in the wu.log.
Just not creating Work Unit folder linking to 2nd Flow.
(Would like to have the user be able to drill to RQ10 from Inbasket Folder.)
I Appreciate any thoughts..
I am thinking that I am not passing something to 2nd PF?
Regards,
Curt
JonA
Veteran Member
Posts: 1163
5/28/2013 7:04 PM
We do something similar. Based on the requesting location we kick off a second flow and a new work unit along with the work unit folder is created. We're passing the Company and Requsition Number variables plus we have the "Pass all start activity/Service variables" box checked.
cBreeze
Basic Member
Posts: 20
5/29/2013 4:13 PM
Jon,
Thanks for response.
I checked off "Pass All" (Still not getting it.)
When you say "passing the Company and Requsition "
Is that what is setup in your service definition/criteria?
My service definition/criteria for both are Company and Location..
It works for the first WU. I get a folder created.
Wondering if I have to change this service definition to include Req# on Both definitions
JonA
Veteran Member
Posts: 1163
5/29/2013 5:27 PM
The Company and Requisition variables were checked in the "Select Start activity variables to be passed" section. Which is redundant since I have the "Pass all" box checked so sorry for the confusion. If it helps our secondary flow does not create a work unit folder either but yet our end users can drill into the requisition data through the inbasket display. Could it have something to do with the display exec? Our secondary flow has a query node much like the first that queries the requisition info again. Is this needed for the drill around? Sorry, my PF knowledge is just enough to maintain/tweak the flows that we have. I don't know much about building them and they were built by the consultant we hired to implement Lawson 10 years ago.
Please
login
to post a reply.