Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Infor / Lawson Platforms
S3 Systems Administration
Sql Server 2005 and Lawson 9.0.1.4
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Zac Shields
Past 24 Hours:
1
Prev. 24 Hours:
1
Overall:
5210
People Online:
Visitors:
411
Members:
0
Total:
411
Online Now:
New Topics
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Post Tax Benefit Plan Table
11/14/2024 9:16 PM
Hi, totally new to Laswon. I have a repor
Lawson S3 Procurement
ED501 Error: Map 850 not supported by /law/c15vda/lawson/test10/edi/bin/laws_out_91
11/12/2024 3:47 PM
Tried runnning ED501 and getting the atathced erro
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Error
11/6/2024 9:54 PM
When I try to enroll a retiree in 72.1 health plan
Infor ERP (Syteline)
Syteline: New Data Maintenance Wizard (Error) Need help
11/1/2024 4:24 PM
Hi, I need help with an error on syteline while us
Dealing with Lawson / Infor
Implementing Lawson v10 with Cerner Surginet, Case Cart Picking, and Quick Adds for the OR
10/29/2024 4:20 PM
Hi Everyone, I am wondering if there is any org
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Canada Tax Calculation (Federal and Provincial) Issue
10/23/2024 5:00 AM
Initially, we had problem with CPP2 calculation is
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
CA Section 125 401k Plan
10/22/2024 10:13 PM
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to fac
S3 Systems Administration
Running AC120 deleted records from ACMASTER table
10/22/2024 3:40 PM
We recently ran the AC120 as normal and somehow it
Lawson S3 Procurement
RQ13 Approval Info
10/17/2024 2:12 PM
When a Requisition is approved on RQ13, what table
S3 Customization/Development
Read and Write CSV file COBOL
10/9/2024 2:53 PM
Does anyone have a quik example of a program that
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3291
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1372
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Announcements
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Infor / Lawson Platforms
S3 Systems Administration
Sql Server 2005 and Lawson 9.0.1.4
Please
login
to post a reply.
6 Replies
0
Subscribed to this topic
27 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
Ward Mitchell
Veteran Member
Posts: 81
4/30/2010 7:07 PM
Hey folks. A newbie to the Lawson world myself, I am working with a company that has implemented Lawson 8.0 on Sql Server 2000 and now want to go to Sql Server 2005 and Lawson 9.0.1.4 and have experienced issues. Read my blog for more on the issue and feel free to respond here or on my blog (which is ligitimate) with any assistance! Thanks much friends!
http://countrypointe.com/...-on-sql-server-2005/
Joe O'Toole
Veteran Member
Posts: 314
4/30/2010 7:20 PM
Was your decision to move to SQL 2005 because of LSF 9.01 requirements? It appears Lawson has removed all traces of SQL 2000 from their supported lists. We're still on 8.03 apps and running LSF 9.004 but looking to upgrade to 9.008 without upgrading SQL which we will do when moving to 9.01. Is anyone out there running 9.008 with SQL 2000?
John Henley
Posts: 3353
4/30/2010 7:30 PM
Accepted Answer
Ward, see this post for some additional insight:
https://www.lawsonguru.co...ft/6139/Default.aspx
Not having the proper (i.e. Lawson-mandated latin_general_bin) collation is definitely going to cause major pain when migrating to 9.0, particularly for the GEN database.
The tier issues are rooted in Lawson's COBOL legacy past (and apparently will carry forward into Landmark, but that is another story for another day). Without going into detail, suffice it to say that Lawson will always perform best when the database is on the app server.
Ward Mitchell
Veteran Member
Posts: 81
4/30/2010 8:04 PM
Accepted Answer
[quote]
Posted By John Henley on 04/30/2010 03:30 PM
Ward, see this post for some additional insight:
https://www.lawsonguru.co...ft/6139/Default.aspx
Not having the proper (i.e. Lawson-mandated latin_general_bin) collation is definitely going to cause major pain when migrating to 9.0, particularly for the GEN database.
The tier issues are rooted in Lawson's COBOL legacy past (and apparently will carry forward into Landmark, but that is another story for another day). Without going into detail, suffice it to say that Lawson will always perform best when the database is on the app server.
[/quote]
John, I was starting to wonder about this and glad you pointed me in the right direction. I will let my folks know that this is probably just the way it will be. We finally got here actually in our testing, but we were just going to trial run it. But maybe now we will just make it official and host Lawson and DB together. It's an executve decision at this point ;) Thanks much for the assistance!
John Henley
Posts: 3353
4/30/2010 8:31 PM
There are some things you can do to make it better depending on your load, size, apps, etc. but it will still never be as good. =
Ward Mitchell
Veteran Member
Posts: 81
4/30/2010 8:52 PM
[quote]
Posted By John Henley on 04/30/2010 04:31 PM
There are some things you can do to make it better depending on your load, size, apps, etc. but it will still never be as good. =
[/quote]
Yeah that's what we fought for the last few weeks. But knowing what we know now, we are in better shape and it looks at thought the 1-tier is what we will shoot for. You will probably see me on here more often, so I'll look for you. Thanks for the help John!
John Henley
Posts: 3353
4/30/2010 9:00 PM
Moving topic to sys admin forum...
Please
login
to post a reply.