Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Infor / Lawson Platforms
S3 Systems Administration
Upgrade to 9.0.1?
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Zac Shields
Past 24 Hours:
1
Prev. 24 Hours:
1
Overall:
5210
People Online:
Visitors:
453
Members:
0
Total:
453
Online Now:
New Topics
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Post Tax Benefit Plan Table
11/14/2024 9:16 PM
Hi, totally new to Laswon. I have a repor
Lawson S3 Procurement
ED501 Error: Map 850 not supported by /law/c15vda/lawson/test10/edi/bin/laws_out_91
11/12/2024 3:47 PM
Tried runnning ED501 and getting the atathced erro
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Error
11/6/2024 9:54 PM
When I try to enroll a retiree in 72.1 health plan
Infor ERP (Syteline)
Syteline: New Data Maintenance Wizard (Error) Need help
11/1/2024 4:24 PM
Hi, I need help with an error on syteline while us
Dealing with Lawson / Infor
Implementing Lawson v10 with Cerner Surginet, Case Cart Picking, and Quick Adds for the OR
10/29/2024 4:20 PM
Hi Everyone, I am wondering if there is any org
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Canada Tax Calculation (Federal and Provincial) Issue
10/23/2024 5:00 AM
Initially, we had problem with CPP2 calculation is
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
CA Section 125 401k Plan
10/22/2024 10:13 PM
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to fac
S3 Systems Administration
Running AC120 deleted records from ACMASTER table
10/22/2024 3:40 PM
We recently ran the AC120 as normal and somehow it
Lawson S3 Procurement
RQ13 Approval Info
10/17/2024 2:12 PM
When a Requisition is approved on RQ13, what table
S3 Customization/Development
Read and Write CSV file COBOL
10/9/2024 2:53 PM
Does anyone have a quik example of a program that
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3291
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1372
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Announcements
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Infor / Lawson Platforms
S3 Systems Administration
Upgrade to 9.0.1?
Please
login
to post a reply.
10 Replies
0
Subscribed to this topic
27 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
wintergreen
Veteran Member
Posts: 93
4/22/2010 7:22 PM
we are currently on 9.0.0.4 on windows 32bit platform. I don't know if we should go to the 9.0.0.8 or directly to 9.0.1? Any suggestion?
John Henley
Posts: 3353
4/22/2010 8:45 PM
901 has diff dependencies than 900. =
wintergreen
Veteran Member
Posts: 93
4/22/2010 8:57 PM
John, what do you mean 'diff dependencies'? Sorry that I have no clue about 901. Thank you!
John Henley
Posts: 3353
4/23/2010 12:45 AM
Assuming you are running WAS 6.0, you will need to upgrade to 6.1/7.0 as well as JDK and Bouncy Castle. =
mark.cook
Veteran Member
Posts: 444
4/23/2010 1:17 PM
In addition to the technical changes as John pointed out, you should also concider the impact to your users. We knew that we would not be able to schedule testing for the MSP/ESP release and then follow up with another upgrade in the near future after that, so we made the jump as much to take advantage of 9.01 technology as to eliminate testing /upgrade cycles for our users.
Jimmy Chiu
Veteran Member
Posts: 641
4/23/2010 1:30 PM
If you have virtualization platform in place, I would open this up as another migration project.
Deploy a new 64 bit 9.0.1.5 and migrate at your own pace. You can take advantage of websphere 7 64 bit and the added support for SQL 2008 if you are running it. SQL 2008's real time data compression is great feature and serve as an alternative for data archiving. On my initial pass, my database shrunk from 370GB to below 190GB. (at around 5gb data growth rate per year, i just bought myself another 20 years worth of time). My read based tranasction performance actually gone up, write based transactions performance went down by slightly. You can target specific table/index for real time compression. Enabling it for most read access table is the best bet.
The best of all however is what vitualzation offers. Ability to snapshot VM and failover VM to avoid downtime results from physical server failure. Taking server image backup becomes a matter of seconds instead of minutes. Upgrading hardware and assigning additional hardware resources to the VM running lawson becomes painless.
Going 64 bit also resolves memory bottleneck issue.
Note: Do not use the new LUU (lawson unix utility), stay with MKS. Some lawson delivered upgrade programs do not work with LUU. (TA>LP upgrade program for example or any program that invokes sh/ksh.)
Check with the compatibility matrix also to see some of the application minimal requirement. 9.0.1.5 ENV requires minimal 9.0.1.0007 RSS version etc.
Brian Allen
Veteran Member
Posts: 104
4/23/2010 1:47 PM
Jimmy, Can you please elaborate on the memory bottleneck issue. We occasionally get an out of memory error on our JVM on test (WAS6.1, env 9.0.0.8). I've since increased the JVM max heap to 2048 at the Lawson Sizing groups recommendation for our case. I'd like to more about the issue you're referring to. We're running under AIX, so this may or may not apply. Thanks.
Jimmy Chiu
Veteran Member
Posts: 641
4/23/2010 2:14 PM
32 bit websphere has memory bottleneck limited by the OS. 2GB is the maximum heap size you can allocate to the application server regardless of what your physical server has in memory.
With 64 bit websphere, that limit has been lifted. Thus, whatever your physical server has, is what you can allocate minus some overhead for the OS/application. IE: on a 16GB server, you can allocated a whooping 10GB to the JVM heap size if that's what your application need.
On my 64 bit developer server, I run 4GB min/max on my websphere 7 heap size.
Brian Allen
Veteran Member
Posts: 104
4/23/2010 2:31 PM
That's great news - thanks for the information!
wintergreen
Veteran Member
Posts: 93
4/23/2010 8:01 PM
Thank you all for the input. Since the windows 2003 will be decommissioned in 2012, I think a new 64bit windows 2008 is the way to go. Maybe SQL 2008 is needed too.
John Henley
Posts: 3353
4/27/2010 6:22 PM
http://blog.lawsonguru.co...upgrade-crazy-train/
Please
login
to post a reply.