MSS & LAUA - LSF 9.0.1.9

 4 Replies
 0 Subscribed to this topic
 15 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Author
Messages
jdever
Advanced Member
Posts: 29
Advanced Member
    I have a custom Lawson form that has a drop down select via a system key number.  This select should view all employees.  It works fine for HR super users (those with a UNIX identity tied to a security class).

    MSS users can only see his/her direct reports when they access the form.  MSS users do not have a UNIX identity and use the "ONLINE" privledged identity tied to "weblaw" in a LAUA secuirty class.

    How can I over-ride Lawson's "my data security"  for this form ???
    We are LAUA.
    LSF version 9.0.1.9
    Thanks.
    John
    Roger French
    Veteran Member
    Posts: 549
    Veteran Member
      In your custom form, is the Lawson security logic (written in COBOL) inside your custom form?

      I would try to review it and see if it make sense for your purposes, to change or remove it according to your needs.


      jdever
      Advanced Member
      Posts: 29
      Advanced Member
        There is no security calls written in the COBOL code.  No calls the any security libraries.
        When executing this form as a user that has no UNIX identity and thus uses the ONLINE privileged identity (weblaw) the form automatically limits any drill select based on employee number.
        Interestingly, I can enter any employee number in the form without a security error.
        --
        If there was a Lawson command to tell the drill to ignore "My Data" security, I would be all set.
        jdever
        Advanced Member
        Posts: 29
        Advanced Member
          Lawson/INFOR came through for me.
          The issue was that the RMID had the ACCESS flag set to "NO" instead of "YES".
          --
          In LAUA this opens you a small security hole that wold allow mangers to run DME & AGS calls if they know how.
          I don't know of any managers that do... so I am good to go.
          John Henley
          Posts: 3353
            I disagree with the size of the security hole, and that's why i didn't recommend it...
            Thanks for using the LawsonGuru.com forums!
            John